Criminal FBAR Penalties – Foreign Account Fraud | IRS Offshore Evasion
- 1 Criminal FBAR Penalties
- 2 What is a Criminal FBAR Penalty?
- 3 What is the Legal Standard for Willful and Non-Willful?
- 4 Reckless Disregard is Still Willful
- 5 Why Are FBAR Penalties So High?
- 6 Turning Non-Willful Violations into Willful Violations
- 7 Can I be Criminally Prosecuted for FBAR?
- 8 What Tax Crimes Can I be Convicted of?
- 9 What are the Options to Reduce or Avoid FBAR Penalties?
- 10 Lawyer Credentials
Criminal FBAR Penalties
FBAR Criminal Penalties can range from severe monetary penalties (50% or $100,000, whichever is higher) that are issued per year, and can reach 100% value of the account, IRS Special Agent Investigations which are quasi-criminal investigations and may lead to an indictment for Tax Fraud, as well as Seizures, Passport Revocation and Customs Holds.
With that said, not every FBAR violation is willful — in fact, most are far from it.
What is a Criminal FBAR Penalty?
For a FBAR Penalty to be criminal, it would have to “willful” or something close to it.
What is the Legal Standard for Willful and Non-Willful?
Despite the fact that the IRS can levy obscene-level penalties against you, it is also good to know that the IRS has not established a set, bright-line rule (clearly defined test) that you can use to determine whether you are willful or non-willful.
There are not as many cases as you would think that have referenced Willful, Non-Willful with respect to FBARs, but there are some guidelines to keep in mind:
Willful does NOT mean Intent or Knowledge
In other words, in order for the IRS to prove willfulness, the IRS does not need to show that you knew you were required to file the FBAR. That would make it too difficult for the IRS – therefore, the IRS has essentially lowered the threshold for themselves to prove Willfulness. This begs the question — what else qualifies as Willful?
Willfulness Can Mean Willful Blindness:
What does Willful Blindness even mean? It means that if you knew that you should have known you were required to file an FBAR, then you could be held to a willful standard.
An example of Willful Blindness:
* Let’s say you were minding your own business and an individual walked up to you and told you they will give you $1 million if you drove their vehicle past a known DEA drug point. Without any question as to why they are offering to pay you this much money to essentially drive a car, you accept the offer and drive the vehicle up-to the checkpoint. Unfortunately, you are unlucky and the car is checked, and the cops discover 200 pounds of uncut cocaine was in the car. You could not argue that you did not know there were drugs in the car (no knowledge), because who pays another person $1,000,000 to drive their car past a drug checkpoint? In other words, you should’ve known there was something amidst… and by not asking, you are willfully blind.
Reckless Disregard is Still Willful
Unlike willful blindness, reckless disregard appears to be an even lower standard of willfulness. At least with willful blindness, you should’ve known to ask, but you knowingly didn’t ask…because you didn’t want to know. With reckless disregard, according to the IRS, while you may have believed you didn’t have a filing requirement, your belief was so “stupid” that the IRS would never believe you are so stupid. Talk about a walking contradiction…
In a recent California District Court decision (Which could still go up on appeal — U.S. vs. Bohanecs) the court relied upon the reckless disregard standard in making its decision – which can be found here. It is important to note that in the Bohanecs, the facts reflected that the Bohanecs were pretty sophisticated…in addition to stupid.
**One very important thing to takeaway from the Bohanecs case, is not just that the threshold to prove willfulness does not require “actual knowledge,” but just as important is that even though willful FBAR penalties are essentially criminal nature, since they are not being enforced in a criminal setting, the government was not required to meet the criminal standard of beyond reasonable doubt.
In other words, if the IRS wants to issue you criminal level penalties in a civil setting, they do not have to reach the level or burden of proof required in a criminal setting — and the standard essentially boils down to someone being…stupid.
Put it this way: With the way the IRS is always increasing enforcement of international tax related matters, is it safe to say that if the IRS believes in any way shape or form that you knew, should’ve known, intentionally blind-to-the-fact, or were just stupid to the fact that you should have been reporting the FBAR, you are probably in for a dogfight with the IRS — because they will presumably try to enforce willful penalties against you.
Why Are FBAR Penalties So High?
This is a good question, to which there is no real proven substantive answer.
Sure, the IRS will argue that is to reduce financial crimes, minimize offshore monies being diverted to illegal operations such as drugs and terrorism, and eliminate offshore tax havens – but these facts have yet to be proven. While the IRS touts that it has recovered more than $10 billion in the offshore disclosure program, it has not indicated that it has achieved any reduction in the above-referenced illegal activities as a direct result of the heightened penalties. In reality, many of these people were just scared individuals who probably did not meet the threshold for Willful, and either did not want to “Chance it” with the Streamlined Program, or too nervous (understandably so) to Opt-Out.
In reality, the IRS knows that this is a money grab. In other words, the IRS is aware that yes, there are some major players in the offshore tax world who were caught with hundreds of millions of dollars offshore, and will now be forced to pay very stiff penalties in order to avoid Jail – but that is not the majority of people the IRS catches.
The IRS must be aware that the majority of individuals who have “offshore” accounts did not create these accounts for any illegitimate purpose. Rather, the majority of these individuals either worked overseas, were originally from overseas before relocating the United States and/or have family overseas. Thus, it would make perfect sense that these individuals would maintain offshore or foreign accounts.
For these individuals it is a very scary ordeal.
Turning Non-Willful Violations into Willful Violations
When the IRS can simply bootstrap a non-willful violation into a willful violation, just by showing that a person should’ve known they should have been reporting their foreign accounts (or the IRS believes they were too “stupid” not to know) – what protection do individuals really have against the willful penalties? Since the IRS refuses to provide a specific bright-line test for taxpayers to determine if they were willful or not — the IRS is intentionally keeping the U.S. taxpayers in the dark.
While there are some situations in which it will be obvious that the person was reckless or willfully blind, there will be many more scenarios/situations in which the person may not have been willfully blind or reckless – but the IRS disagrees and wants to push forward with willful penalties.
Our conclusion is simple: the penalties are so high, in order to catch the big Whales. And, while many small fish may also get caught in the Offshore Disclosure net, the IRS does not a believe in “Catch and Release.”
Can I be Criminally Prosecuted for FBAR?
The IRS has the absolute right to initiate a criminal investigation by assigning your matter one of the IRS special agents to pursue a full-fledged criminal investigation to determine whether you were willful in your failure to report your foreign accounts on an FBAR.
The reality is, the IRS does not always initiate a criminal prosecutions – in fact the chances of them doing so are relatively low. Out of the millions upon millions of violations each year, coupled by the millions of civil audits the IRS launches each year that may uncover an FBAR non-filing, the IRS only prosecutes anywhere from 3000 to 7000 criminal prosecutions each year.
That is not to say that the IRS does not pursue many more criminal investigations, but less than 10,000 each year will reach the point in which the IRS wants to prosecute an individual and place him or her in prison. Usually because the individual is forced to succumb to a pre-indictment resolution – even when they believe they were non-willful.
Offshore tax evasion enforcement is a major priority for the IRS. Each year, the IRS publishes a dirty dozen tax scam list for individuals to be cautious of, and offshore tax evasion is always in the top three spots on the list.
In fact, the U.S. Government has developed specific programs that are specifically designed to combat offshore tax evasion and tax fraud.
Swiss Bank Program
For example, in 2013 the government created the Swiss bank program, which as provided by the DOJ “The Swiss Bank Program, which was announced on August 29, 2013, provides a path for Swiss banks to resolve potential criminal liabilities in the United States. Swiss banks eligible to enter the program were required to advise the department by Dec. 31, 2013, that they had reason to believe that they had committed tax-related criminal offenses in connection with undeclared U.S.-related accounts. Banks already under criminal investigation related to their Swiss-banking activities and all individuals were expressly excluded from the program.
Terrorist Financing and Financial Crimes
As the policy development and outreach office for TFI, the Office of Terrorist Financing and Financial Crimes (TFFC) works across all elements of the national security community – including the law enforcement, regulatory, policy, diplomatic and intelligence communities – and with the private sector and foreign governments to identify and address the threats presented by all forms of illicit finance to the international financial system.
TFFC advances this mission by developing initiatives and strategies to deploy the full range of financial authorities to combat money laundering, terrorist financing, WMD proliferation, and other criminal and illicit activities both at home and abroad. These include not only systemic initiatives to enhance the transparency of the international financial system, but also threat-specific strategies and initiatives to apply and implement targeted financial measures to the full range of national security threats. Primary examples of these roles in advancing this mission is TFFC’s leadership of the U.S. Government delegation to the Financial Action Task Force, which has developed leading global standards for combating money laundering and terrorist financing and its role in specific efforts to counter threats like proliferation, terrorism and the deceptive financial practices of Iran.
Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)
The Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) of the US Department of the Treasury administers and enforces economic and trade sanctions based on US foreign policy and national security goals against targeted foreign countries and regimes, terrorists, international narcotics traffickers, those engaged in activities related to the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, and other threats to the national security, foreign policy or economy of the United States. OFAC acts under Presidential national emergency powers, as well as authority granted by specific legislation, to impose controls on transactions and freeze assets under US jurisdiction. Many of the sanctions are based on United Nations and other international mandates, are multilateral in scope, and involve close cooperation with allied governments.
FinCEN (Financial Crimes Enforcement Network)
This statute establishes FinCEN as a bureau within the Treasury Department and describes FinCEN’s duties and powers to include:
- Maintaining a government-wide data access service with a range of financial transactions information
- Analysis and dissemination of information in support of law enforcement investigatory professionals at the Federal, State, Local, and International levels
- Determine emerging trends and methods in money laundering and other financial crimes
- Serve as the Financial Intelligence Unit of the United States
- Carry out other delegated regulatory responsibilities
**Authorities Delegated to FinCEN pursuant to TREASURY ORDER 180-01
This Treasury Order describes FinCEN’s responsibilities to implement, administer, and enforce compliance with the authorities contained in what is commonly known as the “Bank Secrecy Act.”
What Tax Crimes Can I be Convicted of?
As provided by the IRS, Possible criminal charges related to tax matters include tax evasion (IRC § 7201), filing a false return (IRC § 7206(1)) and failure to file an income tax return (IRC § 7203). Willfully failing to file an FBAR and willfully filing a false FBAR are both violations that are subject to criminal penalties under 31 U.S.C. § 5322. Additional possible criminal charges include conspiracy to defraud the government with respect to claims (18 U.S.C. § 286) and conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud the United States (18 U.S.C. § 371).
– A person convicted of tax evasion is subject to a prison term of up to five years and a fine of up to $250,000. Filing a false return subjects a person to a prison term of up to three years and a fine of up to $250,000.
– A person who fails to file a tax return is subject to a prison term of up to one year and a fine of up to $100,000. Failing to file an FBAR subjects a person to a prison term of up to ten years and criminal penalties of up to $500,000.
– A person convicted of conspiracy to defraud the government with respect to claims is subject to a prison term of up to not more than 10 years or a fine of up to $250,000.
– A person convicted of conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud the United States is subject to a prison term of not more than five years and a fine of up to $250,000.
What are the Options to Reduce or Avoid FBAR Penalties?
In order to avoid severe FBAR penalties, the US government has created a program entitled IRS offshore voluntary disclosure.
Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Tax law is very complex. There are many aspects that go into any particular tax calculation, including the legal status, marital status, business status and residence status of the taxpayer.
**Tax Law is a specialized area of law, and FBAR Penalty Mitigation/Offshore Disclosure is especially complex. Your OVDP or Streamlined Attorney should have:
- At least 15 years of experience as a practicing lawyer
- An advanced Master’s of Tax Law Degree (LL.M.); and
- Either a CPA or Enrolled Agent (EA) license.
While a sole Attorney practitioner may offer a reduced rate, if they are not handling the tax preparation as well as the legal portion of the representation (including signing their own name) to the Tax Return and Legal Submission, then you have to wonder who is going to be handling that portion of the submission. Will you even get the chance to interview the CPA beforehand and work with them during the process?
Likewise, if the firm advertises or markets themselves as a Tax Resolution Firm that also handles OVDP or Offshore Voluntary Disclosure, you have to question how much experience they really have in OVDP, Streamlined, FATCA and FBAR compliance.