Reporting & U.S. Tax on Hong Kong Mandatory Provident Fund: The Hong Kong Provident fund is a form of retirement fund. A provident fund is similar to 401K/Social Security hybrid. Several Asian countries have provident funds as a means of retirement, including: Singapore (CPF), Malaysia (MPF), and Thailand (TPF). Since the U.S. and Hong Kong have not entered into a bilateral tax treaty, there is no tax treaty to refer to when analyzing the investment (e.g., pension vs. social security).
*This article updates our prior article
The Hong Kong government describes the provident fund as:
The MPF System in Hong Kong was designed to form the second pillar of this approach: a mandatory, privately managed, fully funded contribution scheme.
To help the ageing workforce save for their retirement, the Mandatory Provident Fund Schemes Ordinance (“MPFSO”) was enacted in 1995 and later supplemented by subsidiary legislation in 1998, 1999 and 2000. The MPF System was launched in December 2000.
Reporting & U.S. Tax on Hong Kong Mandatory Provident Fund
Since there is no treaty, and the MPF is not identified by the U.S. as a 401/402 retirement plan, there is a high likelihood the contributions and growth are taxable.
Here is a basic introductory analysis of how to evaluate the MPF:
A. Is there a Tax Treaty with Hong Kong and the U.S.?
No. The U.S. has not entered into an Income Tax Treaty with Hong Kong. Therefore, since there is no Tax Treaty, there is no provision(s) regarding how to treat retirement (for a detailed provision on how to treaty, please refer to the U.S. and UK tax treaty). And,. the MPF is not defined as an IRA or 401K in the U.S.
B. Is the MPF Retirement or Social Security?
The MPF is a probably categorized as form of retirement when compared to the U.S. social security system.. The MPF refers to the term “retirement” often within its own writings, and unlike social security, there are different investment schemes available, depending on the employee/employer status etc.. Moreover, the employees/employers can make voluntary contributions, have their own personal account numbers etc. So, while the MPF takes on many characteristics of social security, there is a high likelihood that the U.S. would categorize it as a form of pension or retirement.
C. What Has the IRS Ruled?
The IRS has not made any definitive ruling on how to treat the Hong Kong Provident Fund. But, like Hong Kong, Singapore has its own provident fund (Central Provident Fund). And, the U.S. has also not entered into a treaty with a tax treaty with Singapore either.
As to the CPF, the IRS has issued two Memoranda:
- Contributions on behalf of the employer are taxable.
- The Growth/Accruals within the fund are taxable.
Here is the Golding & Golding detailed analysis on U.S. taxation of Singaporean CPF funds.
Do I have to pay U.S. taxes on MPF income?
Many tax attorneys take the position that since there is no treaty, and the earnings are not per se classified as social security, then it is presumably taxable. Even though the SSA (Social Security Administration) refers to CPF and other provident funds as “privatized social security,” the SSA is not the IRS.
So in the example with the CPF above, even though the SSA refers to provident funds as “social security,” the IRS’ general position is that the contributions and earnings are taxable.
Hong Kong Provident Fund Not Properly Reported to the U.S.
We specialize exclusively in international tax, and specifically IRS offshore disclosure.
We have successfully represented clients in more than 1,000 streamlined and voluntary offshore disclosure submissions nationwide and in over 70-different countries. We have represented thousands of individuals and businesses with international tax problems.
We are the “go-to” firm for other Attorneys, CPAs, Enrolled Agents, Accountants, and Financial Professionals across the globe.
- Learn more about the Board-Certified Tax Lawyer Specialist credential
- Learn more about the Enrolled Agent credential
- Learn more about Golding & Golding’s Case Accomplishments
- Learn more about Golding & Golding Testimonials from prior clients
We are the “go-to” firm for other Attorneys, CPAs, Enrolled Agents, Accountants and Financial Professionals worldwide.
Less than 1% of Tax Attorneys Nationwide Are Certified Specialists
Sean M. Golding is one of less than 350 Attorneys (out of more than 200,000 practicing California Attorneys) to earn the Certified Tax Law Specialist credential. The credential is awarded to less than 1% of Attorneys.
Recent Golding & Golding Case Highlights
- We represented a client in an 8-figure disclosure that spanned 7 countries.
- We represented a high-net-worth client to facilitate a complex expatriation with offshore disclosure.
- We represented an overseas family with bringing multiple businesses & personal investments into U.S. tax and offshore compliance.
- We took over a case from a small firm that unsuccessfully submitted multiple clients to IRS Offshore Disclosure.
- We successfully completed several recent disclosures for clients with assets ranging from $50,000 – $7,000,000+.
How to Hire Experienced Offshore Counsel?
Generally, experienced attorneys in this field will have the following credentials/experience:
- Board Certified Tax Law Specialist credential
- Master’s of Tax Law (LL.M.)
- Dually Licensed as an EA (Enrolled Agent) or CPA
- 20-years experience as a practicing attorney
- Extensive litigation, high-stakes audit and trial experience
Interested in Learning More about Golding & Golding?
No matter where in the world you reside, our international tax team can get you IRS offshore compliant.
Golding & Golding specializes in FBAR and FATCA. Contact our firm today for assistance with getting compliant.
Sean holds a Master's in Tax Law from one of the top Tax LL.M. programs in the country at the University of Denver. He has also earned the prestigious IRS Enrolled Agent credential. Mr. Golding's articles have been referenced in such publications as the Washington Post, Forbes, Nolo, and various Law Journals nationwide.