Foreign Mutual Funds PFIC
Foreign Mutual Funds PFIC: When a U.S. person owns funds overseas, the resulting tax can be dizzying. A foreign mutual fund is generally referred to as a Passive Foreign Investment Company. The foreign mutual funds PFIC analysis is very complicated because it involves several moving parts simultaneously.
The key components include the reporting (FBAR and Form 8621) and the Tax (Growth, Distributions, and Excess Distributions). In order to lessen the blow, the IRS has in place two main elections: Qualified Electing Fund and Mark-to-Market.
When a person has not properly reported the foreign mutual funds, they may be subject to offshore penalties.
IRS Passive Income Tax Treatment
The IRS strictly enforces PFIC Rules.
Each of Your funds is considered to be a PFIC (Passive Foreign Investment Company). That is because the IRS hates Mutual Funds from overseas — so much so, that foreign mutual funds have been designated as PFICs for tax reporting purposes, which is very bad for tax purposes.
That means that even though all you did was purchase some foreign mutual funds through a recommendation or your own research, the Internal Revenue Service has designated those mutual funds as a “Passive Foreign Investment Company.”
To you, that means that even though the money is sitting overseas in an investment that you have never touched, and/or never had any distribution issued to you, portions of the earnings will be taxed at Ordinary Income rates, and possibly the Highest Income Rates allowable under U.S. law (even if you are not otherwise subject to the highest U.S. income bracket) — depending on the size and timing of your distribution.
Moreover, you may be charged interest for the time-period in which your investment sat in the foreign investment fund and was not distributed.
…Sounds fair, right?
So, you just learned that your Foreign Mutual Fund, is probably a PFIC and is reportable on Form 8621…now what?
What is a PFIC?
A PFIC is when a majority of the earnings you receive is facilitated (whether by assets owned or income generated) by passive activities. For example, if you own a shell company in Hong Kong (either through a LTD or BVI) and the sole purpose of the company is to aggregate or ‘pool’ your investments – which generate interest, dividends, capital gains or royalties – then all the income you are earning is passive income.
Let’s take an example: Maria is an astute investor and simplified her paperwork by pooling together all of her mutual funds, equity funds, and ETF’s under one umbrella. The umbrella is a holding Corporation, such as a Hong Kong Limited. All of the investments are owned by the Corporation, which then distributes the income (or not) to Maria.
Since Maria is an owner of the company, and the company generates all of its income through receiving passive investments (as opposed to Maria receiving consulting fees for providing active work to other clients), the corporation would be a default PFIC.
Are PFICs Bad?
Yes, they are inherently harmful when it comes to IRS and tax. Since 2012, a PFIC must be reported each year on a form 8621 – despite whether any excess distributions or proper were earned from the PFIC (post-2012). In addition, if there are distributions and those distributions exceed 125% of the average of up to three years of prior-year distributions, the person will have what is called an excess distribution, unless a proper election was made (Read: If you are reading this article, you probably did not make the election)
Excess distribution calculations are at best, brutal (we have handled cases where a single person had over 35 PFICs in a single trading account., with a mix of interest and dividend income spread over 6 years), and at worst, a time-suck that can drain your pockets, time, and resources — and result in a tax liability far exceeding the Long-Term Capital Gain or Qualified Dividend you may have expected when you first invested in the fund(s).
For a more comprehensive analysis of excess distributions, you can bore yourself with this prior article we prepared on basic form 8621 excess distributions.
The most important take away from an excess distribution is that instead of being taxed at the Long-Term Capital Gain or Qualified Dividend Tax Rate, you will instead be taxed (presuming you did not make any elections), at the highest ordinary income tax rate (even if you are not in the highest tax bracket) for all years aside from the current year, in which you are taxed at your ordinary income rate for the year.
Generally, an investment that was held for a significant amount of time will see a tax upwards of 50 to 75% (or more) of the income, as opposed to a 15 or 20% long-term capital gain a qualified dividend tax rate.
U.S. Mutual Fund – Simple Basics
Mutual funds can be great investments. In a mutual fund, a person invests in a pool of investments with other individuals, for the purpose of earning significant dividends and other passive income. Oftentimes in the United States, mutual funds must distribute a large portion of their annual income to the investors in order to avoid double taxation (for more information regarding mutual funds should speak with a financial professional).
Generally, if you have a mutual fund in the United States, at the end of each year you will usually receive a 1099-INT or 1099-DIV to reflect the amount of dividend or interest income that you received, and you reported on your tax return (unless an exemption or exclusion applies) – this is true, even if it is reinvested with the intent of growing even larger.
*When it comes to Foreign Mutual Funds, the reinvesting is where the problem begins.
**Depending on the type of Mutual Fund, you may be receiving many many forms at year-end.
Foreign Mutual Funds
Foreign Mutual Fund are the same, except that because it is not a U.S. company holding the funds, they are not held to the same standard of reporting that a U.S. mutual fund would be.
As a result, someone could feasibly invest in a Foreign Mutual Fund and instead of receiving, and paying tax on annual distributions that are immediately reinvested (as generally required in the United States), the investments sit in the fund and continue to grow exponentially — without any tax liability to the investor.
Example: Michelle invested in a Foreign Mutual Fund in Singapore. The mutual fund has been growing and performing well, to the tune of 11% increase each year. Michelle initially invested $100,000, but several years later investment is valued at nearly $250,000. All the while, the dividends capital gains, and interest income that would have been distributed and immediately invested in a US-based mutual fund (which would have resulted in a tax liability), just sits in the accounts and Michelle has never received a 1099 from this company.
As a result, Michelle’s investment is essentially growing tax-free as if it was a 401(k) or other retirement vehicle (which receives tax deferred treatment), when in fact is a current investment vehicle that Michelle could access and withdraw from at any time.
The IRS Dislikes Foreign Mutual Funds
The IRS believes that it is missing out on all the tax they should be paid on the earnings that would have been distributed in a U.S. Mutual Fund (even if the earnings are immediately reinvested). As you can imagine, this does not make the IRS very happy — and they needed to take action.
As a result, they determined that since a Foreign Mutual Fund is a pooled investment, essentially if you invested in a Foreign Mutual Fund, then you have some sort of ownership over the Foreign Mutual Fund — to the degree that it should be classified as a PFIC.
It is very important to understand that this is just the tip of the iceberg. For example, David may own one Foreign Mutual Fund and therefore David can more or less track the ups and downs, gains and losses, distributions from the mutual fund. Meanwhile, Scott has an investment scheme through a bank account in India with a $2,000,000 value, and which is actively being traded – and holds upwards of 55 different funds.
While a trading account by default is not a PFIC, the Foreign Mutual Fund and other similar funds being held through the trading account must be dealt with individually. In other words, each Foreign Mutual Fund within the trading account may be its own separate PFIC, which requires its own analysis.
Selling a Foreign Mutual Fund
The IRS is not going to let you off the hook that easy. See, the IRS would not appreciate it very much if you sold the Foreign Mutual Fund before it socked with you taxes and penalties. Therefore, even if you sell the Foreign Mutual Fund, you now have to deal with the issue of Excess Distribution on the Capital Gains aspect of the PFIC.
Example: Peter owns a mutual fund that is valued at $100,000. There have been no other sales of shares of the mutual fund by Peter in prior years. Peter decides that he does not want to deal with PFICs, FBAR, FATCA and other unnecessary acronyms and decides he’s just going to sell mutual fund. Mutual fund is now worth $170,000. Can Peter just sell the mutual fund for long-term capital gain?
… Of course not, that would undermine the IRS’s overreaching definition of a PFIC. Rather, Peter will have to report the sale as an excess distribution.
For example, Peter has a $70,000 excess distribution that is now going to have to go through a comprehensive analysis to determine the tax liability – and it will be much larger than any 15 or 20% long-term capital gain. That is because, as we touched upon above, when there is an excess distribution the individual must pay the highest income tax rate for each year that the investment was held but not distributed.
The purpose of this is for the IRS to reclaim income that would have been taxed for each year that the investment was being “reinvested” in the mutual fund without being distributed
MTM and QEF Election Summary
The two main types of elections, are the (Mark-To-Market) MTM and the (Qualified Electing Fund) QEF:
With the Mark-to-Market election, the investor is making the decision to pay tax on the gains each year, despite the fact that no money is being distributed from the fund. For example, let’s say David owns $100,000 worth of a foreign mutual fund. The fund does great, and David’s fund is now worth $120,000 on the last day of the year.
Even though the investment is not distributing any of the gain to David, he will still pay tax on the $20,000 gain. Moreover, David will pay tax at the ordinary income tax rate, and not any beneficial qualified dividend tax rate. In addition, it should be noted that when the fund loses money, David is highly restricted as to what losses he can take against the gains the already paid tax on.
Can Anybody Make the Election?
No. The election must be made timely and it must be in accordance with Internal Revenue Code section 1296 – which has very strict requirements. As a side note, if a person is submitting to the traditional Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program (OVDP) they are allowed to make an MTM election at the time of the submission. Otherwise, they have to qualify for Reasonable Cause (see below)
What Are The Requirements?
The most important aspect may be that the stock must be marketable. What does that mean? It means that the stock is traded on a national securities exchange, which is registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission or the national market system in accordance with the securities and exchange act of 1934. Alternatively, the stock must be traded on any exchange or other market which the Sec. determines has rules adequate to carry out the purpose of this part.
(Leave it to the government to keep it nice and ambiguous)
In other words, it needs to be legitimate – and, if it’s not registered with the SEC or national market system, then you have to explain to the IRS why the particular type of stock is still valid and should be considered marketable for the election purpose.
The IRS also provides a catchall for regulated investment companies, which provides “In the case of any regulated investment company which is offering for sale or has outstanding any stock of which it is the issuer and which is redeemable at its net asset value, all stock in a passive foreign investment company which it owns directly or indirectly shall be treated as marketable stock for purposes of this section. Except as provided in regulations, similar treatment as marketable stock shall apply in the case of any other regulated investment company which publishes net asset valuations at least annually.”
Why Make This Election?
There are many reasons why, but the most important reason is to avoid the excess distribution. While most people want to delay paying tax as long as they can, with a PFIC — that delay can come at a very stiff price. With an MTM election, it may seem absurd the pay tax on money that is not distributed to you, but the flip-side is that it will help avoid an even larger excessive distribution tax in the future.
In many foreign investments (just as in US investments), the investment does not pay-out during the initial phase of the investment. Rather, many years down the line once the company or investment is successful, then the investor (you) are rewarded with a nice distribution.
With the excess distribution tax/penalty scheme, the longer that the investment remains profitable — but is not being distributed to you — is another year and wish you be paying significant taxes and interest.
Making The Election Late (Excess Distributions)
Outside of the specifics surrounding MTM and OVDP – as with most late elections or other mistakes you want to remedy with the IRS – you can generally make a late Mark-to-Market election under the proper circumstances. Without going into specifics, this generally means that you can show reasonable cause as to why the election was not made earlier.
Please keep in mind, that you will still have to take one excess distribution at the time you make the late election for the prior year gains that were not previously taxed.
For example, let’s say you purchase the fund in 2005 for $100,000. It is now 2017, and after hanging out with your dorky tax lawyer friend, you realize that he is correct and that your foreign mutual fund is considered a PFIC. You also realize that the fund is expected to continue to grow indefinitely. Thus, in 2017 when your fund is worth about $400,000, you decide to take a late mark-to-market election.
While going forward you can use the MTM rules, for the prior years — starting from the cost basis (which is the value when you purchased it) and through the current value of the investment — you will have to perform a phantom excess distribution analysis (Phantom, because based on these facts you are not actually receiving any distribution from your foreign mutual fund).
QEF – An Alternative to the MTM Election
A QEF is a Qualified Electing Fund election. The QEF is different than the Mark-to-Market election, the QEF does not have many downsides to it, aside from the fact that you may be hard-pressed to get the information you need from the foreign investment company. Unlike the Mark-to-Market election, QEF election requires some cooperation from the foreign investment fund, which pretty much never happens.
But, if you are able to obtain the necessary information from the foreign investment fund in order to make the election, then it is something to consider because it will essentially put you into the same tax position that you would be in if it was a US fund (but not exactly).
Character of the Income
Unlike the mark-to-market election in which all gains are considered to be ordinary income, under the QEF election the income retains its character. Therefore, it was capital gain inside the fund, then it will be considered capital gain when you pay tax on it in the United States. It should be noted, that even under a QEF election, dividends issued by the foreign investment will not qualify as qualified dividends under US tax law.
The biggest problem with the QEF election is that unless it was the first year of your investment, what happens to all of the accumulated money in the prior years… Unfortunately, even with the QEF, you will still have to do at least one excess distribution.
Why an Excess Distribution if making a QEF election?
The reason you still have one excess distribution (unless the QEF election is made during the first year of the investment) is because during the time you held investment, and up until the time you make election, the fund may be growing.
And, once you make the QEF — election you will be entitled to nearly the same tax treatment the foreign investment just as if it was a US investment — so what about all the gains during the time between the initial investment and the QEF?
In other words, to rid yourself of the horrible excess distribution in the future (Read: PFIC Taint), you have to suck it up at the time you make the QEF election, and pay the 1291 tax rate for all the gains up until the time you make the election and pay them as an excess distribution.
Is a QEF Election Worth it?
For the majority of people — if the offshore investment is legitimate — and they are able to obtain the necessary information from the foreign fund to determine the annual growth, the QEF election is a good option. In reality, many people invest in offshore funds for the simple reason that they don’t want to know the annual growth, or how the investment increased in value – they just want the payout.
For example, you invest in a foreign fund in year one and you can get back double your initial investment in year 5. Many people do not want to know what happened between year 1 and year 5…
Golding & Golding: About our International Tax Law Firm
Golding & Golding specializes exclusively in international tax, and specifically IRS offshore disclosure.
We are the “go-to” firm for other Attorneys, CPAs, Enrolled Agents, Accountants, and Financial Professionals across the globe. Our attorneys have worked with thousands of clients on offshore disclosure matters, including FATCA & FBAR.
Each case is led by a Board-Certified Tax Law Specialist with 20-years experience, and the entire matter (tax and legal) is handled by our team, in-house.
*Please beware of copycat tax and law firms misleading the public about their credentials and experience.
Less than 1% of Tax Attorneys Nationwide Are Certified Specialists
Sean M. Golding is one of less than 350 Attorneys (out of more than 200,000 practicing California Attorneys) to earn the Certified Tax Law Specialist credential. The credential is awarded to less than 1% of Attorneys.
Recent Golding & Golding Case Highlights
- We represented a client in an 8-figure disclosure that spanned 7 countries.
- We represented a high-net-worth client to facilitate a complex expatriation with offshore disclosure.
- We represented an overseas family with bringing multiple businesses & personal investments into U.S. tax and offshore compliance.
- We took over a case from a small firm that unsuccessfully submitted multiple clients to IRS Offshore Disclosure.
- We successfully completed several recent disclosures for clients with assets ranging from $50,000 – $7,000,000+.
How to Hire Experienced Offshore Counsel?
Generally, experienced attorneys in this field will have the following credentials/experience:
- 20-years experience as a practicing attorney
- Extensive litigation, high-stakes audit and trial experience
- Board Certified Tax Law Specialist credential
- Master’s of Tax Law (LL.M.)
- Dually Licensed as an EA (Enrolled Agent) or CPA
Interested in Learning More about Golding & Golding?
No matter where in the world you reside, our international tax team can get you IRS offshore compliant.
Golding & Golding specializes in FBAR and FATCA. Contact our firm today for assistance with getting compliant.