Reasonable Cause vs. Streamlined Procedures – Is One Option Better?
- 1 Should I Go Reasonable Cause or Streamlined
- 2 IRM Reasonable Cause
- 3 When Does Reasonable Cause NOT Exist?
- 4 IRS Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures?
- 5 Different Types of Streamlined Procedures
- 6 Reasonable Cause vs. Lower Standards of Willfulness
- 7 What is Willful Blindness?
- 8 What is Reckless Disregard?
- 9 Golding & Golding, A PLC
Reasonable Cause vs. Streamlined Procedures – Is One Option Better?
Reasonable Cause vs, Streamlined Disclosure: So, you just found out you were supposed to be reporting your offshore and foreign assets, accounts, investments, and income to the IRS. You think it’s ridiculous (and you’re right), but you also have a life to lead — and would prefer to do so outside of the watchful eye of the IRS.
Therefore, you decide to get offshore compliant.
You make it past the “Free Consultations,” Scaremongering websites, and general tax practitioners and land on the websites of a few Board-Certified Tax Law Specialists.
You finally narrow it down to two options: Reasonable Cause or Streamlined,
Let’s take a look:
Should I Go Reasonable Cause or Streamlined
A Reasonable Cause submission letter for FBAR, FATCA and international tax in general is a very complex and delicate undertaking, There is no “form” for the submission, and you need to rely on the experience of your Tax Attorney.
A Few Examples that May Qualify for Reasonable Cause:
IRS Reasonable Cause Example 1
80-year-old Michael travels worldwide and has 3 accounts in different countries. He only uses the foreign money when he is in the foreign country at issue, he never transfers the money to the US, and there is usually a relatively small amounts of money in each account.
The only issue for Michael was that at one point, Michael thought about purchasing a home overseas and left the money in the foreign account for a significant period of time (including 12/31). Foreign taxes were fully paid on the money deposited into the account and foreign taxes were paid on the income the account generated. His only mistake was that he did not report the account and/or the foreign income on his U.S. Tax Return.
Reasonable Cause Example 2
Michelle, a widow who had never been in trouble with the law, moved to the United States over 30 years ago but has a $1 million USD foreign pension from a private employer through the early 1970s. She has never accessed the account nor has she contributed (or anyone else contributed) since arriving in the United States. The account/earnings are not taxed in the US until distributed, there have been no distributions, and Michelle never reported the account on an FBAR or 8938.
Reasonable Cause Example 3
David has a foreign account, which he received as an inheritance. He never touched the money, and even though the account earns minimal annual income, there is no tax for passive income in this particular country. He has no other ties to the country and has not used any of the money. David’s son has special needs and he needs to access a large chunk of the money in a short period of time. He has not reported the account on an FBAR or 8938.
IRM Reasonable Cause
The Internal Revenue Manual provides some “Guidelines” for Reasonable Cause:
Reasonable cause is based on all the facts and circumstances in each situation and allows the IRS to provide relief from a penalty that would otherwise apply. Reasonable cause relief is generally granted when the taxpayer exercised ordinary business care and prudence in determining his or her tax obligations but was nevertheless unable to comply with those obligations.
In the interest of equitable treatment of the taxpayer and effective tax administration, the non-assertion or abatement of certain civil penalties based on reasonable cause or other relief provisions provided in this IRM must be made in a consistent manner and should conform with the considerations specified in the IRC.
Reasonable cause relief is not available for all penalties; however, other exceptions may apply.
For those penalties where reasonable cause can be considered, any reason which establishes that the taxpayer exercised ordinary business care and prudence, but nevertheless was unable to comply with a prescribed duty within the prescribed time, will be considered.
If a reasonable cause provision applies only to a specific IRC section, that reasonable cause provision will be discussed in the IRM 20.1 section relating to that specific IRC section.
When considering the information provided in the following subsections, remember that an acceptable explanation is not limited to those given in IRM 20.1. Penalty relief may be warranted based on an “other acceptable explanation,” provided the taxpayer exercised ordinary business care and prudence but was nevertheless unable to comply within the prescribed time. See IRM 184.108.40.206.2.2, Ordinary Business Care and Prudence.
The wording used to describe reasonable cause provisions varies. Some IRC penalty sections also require evidence that the taxpayer acted in good faith or that the taxpayer’s failure to comply with the law was not due to willful neglect. See specific IRM 20.1 sections for the rules that apply to a specific IRC penalty section. See IRM 220.127.116.11.2, Organization of IRM 20.1.
Taxpayers have reasonable cause when their conduct justifies the non-assertion or abatement of a penalty. Each case must be judged individually based on the facts and circumstances at hand. Consider the following in conjunction with specific criteria identified in the remainder of this subsection:
What happened and when did it happen?
During the period of time the taxpayer was non-compliant, what facts and circumstances prevented the taxpayer from filing a return, paying a tax, and/or otherwise complying with the law?
How did the facts and circumstances result in the taxpayer not complying?
How did the taxpayer handle the remainder of his or her affairs during this time?
Once the facts and circumstances changed, what attempt did the taxpayer make to comply?
When Does Reasonable Cause NOT Exist?
As provided by the IRS:
“Reasonable cause does not exist if, after the facts and circumstances that explain the taxpayer’s noncompliant behavior cease to exist, the taxpayer fails to comply with the tax obligation within a reasonable period of time.”
IRS Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures?
The Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures were created in 2014 by the Internal Revenue Service. The purpose of the procedures are to assist taxpayers who were noncompliant with offshore reporting requirements – but were also non-willful.
As a result of being non-willful, the IRS reduces the penalty structure, and even waives the penalty for applicants who qualify as foreign residents.
SFCP is an acronym for Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures.
Different Types of Streamlined Procedures
The Streamlined Procedures can be broken further down into two (2) programs:
- Streamlined Domestic Offshore Procedures (SDOP)
- Streamlined Foreign Offshore Procedures (SFOP)
Streamlined Domestic Procedures (U.S. Residents)
Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures for US persons residing in the United States (or do not meet the technical “Foreign Resident Test”) is referred to as the Streamlined Domestic Offshore Procedures for U.S. Residents.
Typically, there are three (3) main eligibility requirements that a U.S. Taxpayer must meet in order to qualify and become eligible for the Streamlined Domestic Offshore Procedures.
The requirements include:
- Non-Willful Certification Statement using IRS Form 14654
- Not Qualify as a Foreign Resident
- Filed Timely Tax Returns
Streamlined Domestic Resources:
- Summary on eligibility and submission requirements for the Streamlined Domestic Offshore Procedures.
- Summary on how to calculate the 5% Streamlined Penalty
Streamlined Foreign Procedures (Non-U.S. Residents)
Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures for US persons residing outside the United States is referred to as the Streamlined Foreign Offshore Procedures.
Streamlined Foreign Offshore Procedures (SFOP) are a highly cost-effective method of quickly getting you into IRS (Internal Revenue Service) or DOT (Department of Treasury) compliance before it is too late! It allows individuals to come into IRS Tax and Reporting Compliance, without having to pay any penalties.
The requirements include:
- Qualify as Non-Willful;
- Meet the 330-Day Foreign Residence Test/Non U.S. Person; and
- You do not have to have filed all prior year tax returns.
Streamlined Domestic Resources:
Reasonable Cause vs. Lower Standards of Willfulness
If you are willful, you do not qualify for either program, and willful does not mean intent.
There can be “lower” forms of willfulness, which do not require willful or intent — these additional willful standard are referred to as:
If you have any concern of willful vs. non-willful, It is crucial that you consult with an experienced Streamlined and Offshore Disclosure Lawyer before making any submission.
What is Willful Blindness?
Willful Blindness is a form of “deliberate ignorance.” It is the concept that a person could readily obtain information, which if they did, would inform them that their actions could be criminal. Instead of seeking out the information, they “intentionally” avoid learning the information (aka burying their head in the sand).
What does Willful Blindness Mean?
It means you are “willfully” staying ignorant to a fact that would inform you that your actions are illegal.
Is Willful Blindness a Crime?
Yes. It is a substitute for willfulness. In other words, while you may have not intended to cause a crime, the fact that had you made yourself uninformed to the fact that your actions were illegal — takes you over the willfulness threshold.
What is the Mens Rea of Willful Blindness?
The idea of Mens Rea of Willful Blindness is the idea that the knowledge of the crime is presumed, due to the intentional lack of knowledge on the part of the participant.
What is Deliberate Ignorance?
Deliberate ignorance is essentially a synonym for willful blindness.
Willful Blindness Law School 101 Definition
Outside of the world of FBAR Penalties, the willful blindness standard is nothing new.
Here’s a typical example you learn in your first-year criminal law and procedures class:
David and his friends are hanging out in a seedy part of Tijuana. A Gentlemen approaches them and tells David and his two buddies that he will pay them each $1 million if they drive a car across the border.
None of the individuals ask the man why he is paying them that much to drive a vehicle for a few hours. Clearly, they should have some questions, but the money is just too good.
Therefore, David and his friends avoid asking any questions, believing if they do not ask, then they cannot know what is in the car – and that will absolve them from liability.
When they get pulled over and the police discover 50 pounds of cocaine in the car, the fact that they “didn’t know about the drugs” would not matter — since they were “willfully blind.”
What is Reckless Disregard?
Reckless disregard is a lower standard of willful. It does not require intent, but rather behavior which shows the U.S. person could have known and/or could have filed the FBAR.
How do the Courts Define Reckless Disregard?
Reckless Disregard In offshore disclosure, essentially means: “I Could have known better.”
The court in Bohanecs summarizes reckless disregard as:
“Although Defendants assert that “willfulness” encompasses only intentional violations of known legal duties, and not reckless disregard of statutory duties, no court has adopted that principle in a civil tax matter.
Where willfulness is an element of civil liability, the Supreme Court generally understands the term as covering “not only knowing violations of a standard, but reckless ones as well.” Safeco, 551 U.S. at 57.
– Recklessness” is an objective standard that looks to whether conduct entails “an unjustifiably high risk of harm that is either known or so obvious that it should be known.” Safeco, 551 U.S. at 68 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).
– Several other courts, citing Safeco, have held that “willfulness” under 31 U.S.C. § 5321 includes reckless disregard of a statutory duty. See United States v Williams, 489 Fed.Appx. 655, 658 (4th Cir. 2012); United States v. Bussell, No. CV15-02034 SJO(VBKx), 2015 WL 9957826 at *5 (C.D. Cal. Dec. 8, 2015); see also United States v. McBride, 908 F.Supp. 2d 1186, 1204, 1209 (D. Utah 2012).”
This is why you absolutely should retain a Board-Certified Tax Law Specialist for this type of submission.
Golding & Golding, A PLC
We have successfully represented clients in more than 1000 streamlined and voluntary disclosure submissions nationwide, and in over 70-different countries.
We are the “go-to” firm for other Attorneys, CPAs, Enrolled Agents, Accountants, and Financial Professionals across the globe.
- Learn more about the Board-Certified Tax Law Specialist credential
- Learn more about Golding & Golding’s Case Accomplishments
- Learn more about Golding & Golding Testimonials from prior clients
Sean holds a Master's in Tax Law from one of the top Tax LL.M. programs in the country at the University of Denver. He has also earned the prestigious IRS Enrolled Agent credential. Mr. Golding's articles have been referenced in such publications as the Washington Post, Forbes, Nolo, and various Law Journals nationwide.
Latest posts by International Tax Lawyers - Golding & Golding, A PLC (see all)
- Case Study Example of Offshore Accounts Filing & Reporting - October 15, 2019
- Tax Attorney Credentials & Experience in Offshore Disclosure - October 13, 2019
- Just Learned About FBAR & Missed Prior Filings, Now What? - October 8, 2019