Hidden Swiss Accounts & Lying in IRS Audit Leads to Prison

For U.S. taxpayers who are hiding money offshore in countries like Switzerland, it is important that they take note of the recent case of U.S. v Rotta. In this case, the taxpayer was hiding accounts offshore in Switzerland. With his attorneys, he formed false trusts and loan repayment agreements that were fake. The purpose of creating these sham agreements was so that the taxpayer could keep money offshore and generate income without having to report this information to the US government on its tax return or international information reporting forms such as the FBAR or Form 8938. As time marched on, the taxpayer became aware that the IRS would ultimately obtain this information from the Swiss financial institutions, so the taxpayer then entered the IRS VDP (Voluntary Disclosure Program) and provided allegedly false statements during the audit, which led to his being prosecuted and ultimately convicted of tax crimes, resulting in prison.

As provided by the IRS:

Defendant Hid Millions in Swiss Accounts and Lied to the IRS During Audit

A Miami man was sentenced today to 60 months in prison for conspiring to defraud the United States by concealing millions of dollars in assets and income in undisclosed Swiss bank accounts and claiming to the IRS that those assets were not his and instead belonged to foreign nationals.

The following is according to court documents and statements made in court: between 1985 and 2020, Dan Rotta, a dual Brazilian and U.S. citizen, hid more than $20 million in assets in dozens of secret Swiss accounts at five different Swiss banks, including UBS, Credit Suisse, Bank Bonhôte, and Bank Julius Baer. The accounts were held in his own name, in the names of sham structures, and, in one instance, a pseudonym. Over the years, Rotta earned tens of millions of dollars of income from these assets that he did not report on his tax returns and used to fund his lavish lifestyle. He caused a substantial tax loss to the IRS.

Rotta employed increasingly elaborate schemes to keep his accounts hidden. Over the years, he kept his accounts open, in part, by falsely representing that he was not a U.S. citizen, leveraging his Brazilian citizenship to claim he was a Brazilian citizen residing in Brazil.

Starting in 2008, after it was reported publicly that UBS and its bankers were under criminal investigation for helping U.S. taxpayers evade their taxes, Rotta closed his UBS account and moved his funds to Credit Suisse and Bank Bonhôte.

In 2011, after the IRS obtained records related to one of Rotta’s Swiss accounts, he nominally changed the documentation of his accounts at Credit Suisse and Bank Bonhôte to make it appear that his co-conspirator, a Brazilian national and resident, owned the assets in the accounts. Despite the change, Rotta continued to control the assets and transferred millions of dollars out of those accounts for his use.

Shortly after Rotta changed the account documentation, the IRS audited him. During the audit, Rotta falsely denied that he owned the assets in the foreign financial accounts and, instead, claimed that the millions of dollars he withdrew from the accounts were non-taxable loans from foreign nationals. Rotta provided the IRS with fake promissory notes and false affidavits from the foreign nationals to corroborate his claims. During the audit, Rotta continued to use the funds in his foreign accounts to fund his lifestyle in the United States, but to conceal his use of the funds from the IRS, he often routed transfers from his foreign accounts through nominee accounts and attorney trust fund accounts in the United States.

The IRS did not believe Rotta’s story and assessed millions of dollars of additional taxes as well as penalties and interest against him. Rotta sought to reverse the assessments by filing a false petition in U.S. Tax Court. In that petition, Rotta, through his attorney, falsely denied having any foreign accounts and attached fictitious loan documents. Furthermore, the nominee account owners traveled to the United States to retell the false loan story to IRS attorneys.

In 2017, after Rotta presented the false evidence that the purported loans had been repaid, the IRS reversed the deficiencies and agreed that he owed no additional tax. Unbeknownst to the IRS, however, the “loan repayments” were fake: the funds that Rotta purportedly repaid went back into accounts that he controlled shortly after the IRS dismissed the suit. Also, as part of the conspiracy, Rotta had his U.S.-based attorneys create sham trust structures that he used to transfer his assets to the United States without alerting the IRS. On paper, it appeared that Rotta’s co-conspirator funded the trusts for Rotta’s benefit. In reality, Rotta funded the trusts with transfers from his Swiss accounts.

In 2019, Rotta became aware that the IRS would receive additional account records from Switzerland that contradicted the false claims that he had previously made. In an attempt to avoid criminal liability, Rotta applied to participate in the IRS’s voluntary disclosure practice. Under that practice, taxpayers who failed to comply with their tax and reporting obligations could make timely, accurate, and complete disclosures of their conduct, which might offer a path to resolve their non-compliance and limit their criminal exposure. Rotta made false statements in his submission, including falsely claiming that the assets in the Swiss accounts mostly belonged to others, and that any funds provided to him were non-taxable gifts. Rotta also falsely claimed that the nominee account owner gifted Rotta money because that nominee had no children to benefit from the funds. In fact, that nominee had two children.In addition to his prison sentence, U.S. District Judge Rodney Smith for the Southern District of Florida ordered Rotta to serve three years of supervised release. The court will determine restitution at a later date.

Late Filing Penalties May be Reduced or Avoided

For Taxpayers who did not timely file their FBAR and/or other international information-related reporting forms, the IRS has developed many different offshore amnesty programs to assist Taxpayers with safely getting into compliance. These programs may reduce or even eliminate international reporting penalties.

Late-Filing Disclosure Options

If a Taxpayer is out of compliance, there are various international offshore tax amnesty programs that they can apply to safely get into compliance. Depending on the specific facts and circumstances of the Taxpayers’ noncompliance, they can determine which program will work best for them.

*Below please find separate links to each program with extensive details about the reporting requirements and examples.

Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures (SFCP, Non-Willful)

The Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures is one of the most common programs used by Taxpayers who are non-willful and qualify for either the Streamlined Domestic Offshore Procedures or Streamlined Foreign Offshore Procedures.

Streamlined Domestic Offshore Procedures (SDOP, Non-Willful)

Taxpayers who are considered U.S. residents and file timely tax returns each year but fail to report foreign income and/or assets may consider the Streamlined Domestic Offshore Procedures.

Streamlined Foreign Offshore Procedures (SFOP, Non-Willful)

Taxpayers who are foreign residents may consider the Streamlined Foreign Offshore Procedures which is typically the preferred program of the two streamlined procedures. That is because under this program Taxpayers can file original returns and the 5% title 26 miscellaneous offshore penalty is waived.

Delinquent FBAR Submission Procedures (DFSP, Non-Willful/Reasonable Cause)

Taxpayers who only missed the FBAR reporting and do not have any unreported income or other international information reporting forms to file may consider the Delinquent FBAR Submission Procedures — which may include a penalty waiver.

Delinquent International Information Returns Submission Procedures (DIIRSP, Reasonable Cause)

Taxpayers who have undisclosed foreign accounts and assets beyond just the FBAR — but have no unreported income — may consider the Delinquent International Information Return Submission Procedures. Before November 2020, the IRS was more inclined to issue a penalty waiver, but since then this type of delinquency procedure submission has morphed into a reasonable cause request to waive or abate penalties.

IRS Voluntary Disclosure Procedures (VDP, Willful)

For Taxpayers who are considered willful, the IRS offers a separate program referred to as the IRS Voluntary Disclosure Program (VDP). This program is used by Taxpayers to disclose both unreported domestic and offshore assets and income (before 2018, there was a separate program that only dealt with offshore assets (OVDP), but that program merged back into the traditional voluntary disclosure program (VDP).

Quiet Disclosure

Quiet disclosure is when a Taxpayer submits information to the IRS regarding the undisclosed foreign accounts, assets, and income but they do not go through one of the approved offshore disclosure programs. This is illegal and the IRS has indicated they have every intention of investigating Taxpayers who they discover intentionally sought to file delinquent forms to avoid the penalty instead of submitting to one of the approved methods identified above.

Current Year vs. Prior Year Non-Compliance

Once a Taxpayer missed the tax and reporting (such as FBAR and FATCA) requirements for prior years, they will want to be careful before submitting their information to the IRS in the current year. That is because they may risk making a quiet disclosure if they just begin filing forward in the current year and/or mass filing previous year forms without doing so under one of the approved IRS offshore submission procedures. Before filing prior untimely foreign reporting forms, Taxpayers should consider speaking with a Board-Certified Tax Law Specialist who specializes exclusively in these types of offshore disclosure matters.

Avoid False Offshore Disclosure Submissions (Willful vs Non-Willful)

In recent years, the IRS has increased the level of scrutiny for certain streamlined procedure submissions. When a person is non-willful, they have an excellent chance of making a successful submission to Streamlined Procedures. If they are willful, they would submit to the IRS Voluntary Disclosure Program instead. But, if a willful Taxpayer submits an intentionally false narrative under the Streamlined Procedures (and gets caught), they may become subject to significant fines and penalties.

**Need Help Finding an Experienced Offshore Tax Attorney?**

When it comes to hiring an experienced international tax attorney to represent you for unreported foreign and offshore account reporting, it can become overwhelming for Taxpayers trying to trek through all the false information and nonsense they will find in their online research. There are only a handful of attorneys worldwide who are Board-Certified Tax Specialists and who specialize exclusively in offshore disclosure and international tax amnesty reporting.

*This resource may help Taxpayers seeking to hire offshore tax counsel: How to Hire an Offshore Disclosure Lawyer.

Golding & Golding: About Our International Tax Law Firm

Golding & Golding specializes exclusively in international tax, specifically IRS offshore disclosure.

Contact our firm today for assistance.