Provident Fund (U.S. Tax & Reporting) - Board-Certified Tax Law Specialist

Provident Fund (U.S. Tax & Reporting) – Board-Certified Tax Law Specialist

Are Provident Funds Reportable?

Provident Funds (U.S. Tax & Reporting Rules): A common question we receive at Golding & Golding, is whether a Provident Fund is taxable and Reportable in the U.S.

Generally, foreign provident funds are reportable on international reporting forms such as the FBAR and FATCA Form 8938.

In recent years, the IRS has taken an aggressive position on matters involving foreign accounts compliance.

If you have not reported in previous years, you may consider speaking with a Board-Certified Tax Law Specialist.

Are Provident Funds Taxable?

Whether or not the Provident Fund are taxable will vary based on various factors, such as whether:

A. The Provident Fund is employment-based or personal investment
B. The U.S. and foreign country entered into a Tax Treaty
C. The IRS (or courts) have issued any rulings or memoranda about the provident fund

First, Is the Provident Fund Personal or Employment?

Generally, a personal investment fund is taxed during the growth phases, unless otherwise exempted or excluded — such as a Canadian RRSP or RRIF.

Example of a Personal Provident Fund

The first part of the provident fund analysis is whether the provident fund is employment-based or personal investment. For example, in India, there is a “personal” investment referred to as a PPF. A PPF is a Public Provident Fund.

This type of provident fund is a personal investment provident fund. It is not employer based (unlike an Indian EPF, which is employment based). While the PPF accrued growth is tax-deferred in India, it is generally taxable in the U.S.

*There may be other PPF issues involving Form 3520-A and PFIC Form 8621.

If the Provident Fund is Employment Based, is there a Tax Treaty?

If the provident fund is employment based, the main question will be whether there was a Treaty or not.

Here are two examples:

Singapore CPF (Central Provident Fund) – NO TREATY

The CPF is a typical example. CPF is a Central Provident Fund retirement plan, which is “compulsory” for most employees in Singapore. The U.S. has not entered into a tax treaty with Singapore. Therefore, there is no “treaty” to refer to.

In 1996 the IRS issued memoranda stating that:

• Contributions made on behalf of the U.S. person employee are taxable; and
• Growth within the fund is taxable.

India EPF (Employees Provident Fund) – TREATY COUNTRY

For example, in India the EPF is employment-based. Since the U.S. has entered into a treaty with India, tax on the EPF growth or accruals within the fund (prior to distribution) can usually be avoided.

Other common types of Provident Funds are:

  • Hong Kong Provident Fund (MPF)
  • Malaysia Provident Fund (EPF)
  • Nepal Provident Fund (EPF)
  • South Africa Provident Fund

Taking an IRS Form 8833 Treaty Position

Despite the IRS memoranda or other rulings being issued by the court, some clients may want to consider taking a treaty position if there is a treaty with the country.

Out of Tax and Reporting Compliance?

If you are out of compliance, we can help!

Our Process is Simple & Completely Confidential

When you are ready to discuss the specifics of your case, visit our contact us page or directly through email at to schedule a Reduced Fee Telephone Consultation with an experienced IRS Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Lawyer.

We offer consultations in 30-minute, 60-minute, and 90-minute increments.

Golding & Golding: About Our International Tax Law Firm

Golding & Golding specializes exclusively in international tax, and specifically IRS offshore disclosure

We are the “go-to” firm for other Attorneys, CPAs, Enrolled Agents, Accountants, and Financial Professionals across the globe. Our attorneys have worked with thousands of clients on offshore disclosure matters, including FATCA & FBAR.

Each case is led by a Board-Certified Tax Law Specialist with 20 years of experience, and the entire matter (tax and legal) is handled by our team, in-house.

*Please beware of copycat tax and law firms misleading the public about their credentials and experience.

Less than 1% of Tax Attorneys Nationwide Are Certified Specialists

Sean M. Golding is one of less than 350 Attorneys (out of more than 200,000 practicing California Attorneys) to earn the Certified Tax Law Specialist credential. The credential is awarded to less than 1% of Attorneys.

Recent Golding & Golding Case Highlights

  • We represented a client in an 8-figure disclosure that spanned 7 countries.
  • We represented a high-net-worth client to facilitate a complex expatriation with offshore disclosure.
  • We represented an overseas family with bringing multiple businesses & personal investments into U.S. tax and offshore compliance.
  • We took over a case from a small firm that unsuccessfully submitted multiple clients to IRS Offshore Disclosure.
  • We successfully completed several recent disclosures for clients with assets ranging from $50,000 – $7,000,000+.

How to Hire Experienced Form 8938 Counsel?

Generally, experienced attorneys in this field will have the following credentials/experience:

  • 20-years experience as a practicing attorney
  • Extensive litigation, high-stakes audit and trial experience
  • Board Certified Tax Law Specialist credential
  • Master’s of Tax Law (LL.M.)
  • Dually Licensed as an EA (Enrolled Agent) or CPA

Interested in Learning More about Golding & Golding?

No matter where in the world you reside, our international tax team can get you IRS offshore compliant. 

Golding & Golding specializes in FBAR and FATCA. Contact our firm today for assistance with getting compliant.

    Font Resize